This Year's Campaign Direction

d34th 42 posts Since Jun 25, 2026

We are entering the planning phase for this year's operations.

In previous years, much of our attention was directed toward technical intrusions, data acquisition, and direct disruption. This year, I want us to broaden our focus. The objective is not merely to gain access to systems. The objective is to shape outcomes.

Organizations make decisions because people make decisions. Markets move because people react. Reputations rise and fall because narratives spread. Influence is often more valuable than access.

As we develop plans, I want everyone thinking beyond networks and databases. Consider how information flows through organizations. Consider who holds authority, who advises leadership, who controls messaging, and who quietly influences outcomes behind the scenes.

Our targets remain familiar, but our goals should evolve. We should be looking for opportunities to place pressure on decision-makers, exploit conflicts of interest, encourage internal discord, and create situations that benefit DEADFACE's long-term objectives. A company does not need to be destroyed if it can be persuaded to act against its own interests. An organization does not need to be breached if its leadership can be manipulated into making poor decisions.

This will require coordination across multiple disciplines. Technical specialists, researchers, insiders, and social engineers all have roles to play.

Over the coming weeks, I expect proposals focused on influence, perception, and leverage. Think strategically. Think patiently. The most effective operation is often the one nobody realizes occurred.

mort1cia 59 posts Since Jun 25, 2026

Finally.

Too many people equate success with access alone. Access is a tool, not the objective. The best operations are the ones that change behavior without drawing attention to the mechanism that caused it.

I expect everyone to think bigger this year.

spookyboi 50 posts Since Jun 25, 2026

Agreed.

People are predictable.

luciafer 44 posts Since Jun 25, 2026

Low-key, this is my favorite direction we've taken in a while.

Everyone obsesses over breaking into systems, but most organizations practically tell you how they work if you pay attention long enough. The public-facing side of a company is usually the weakest link.

daem0n 37 posts Since Jun 25, 2026

yeah, honestly this makes sense.

At some companies, leadership already makes questionable decisions on their own. Sometimes it feels like watching one of those old disaster movies where everybody ignores the obvious warning signs until it's too late.

Not that anyone ever gets my references.

lilith 49 posts Since Jun 25, 2026

Influence campaigns require patience, which means half of you are going to get bored after three days.

Still, the payoff can be huge when people start making decisions they think were their own idea.

mirveal 52 posts Since Jun 25, 2026

This approach also creates more opportunities for intelligence gathering.

Understanding organizational relationships is often more valuable than understanding infrastructure.

Different battlefield. Same objective.

gh0st404 84 posts Since Jun 25, 2026

lol imagine spending millions on security and then getting wrecked by office politics

wild

sunstalker 60 posts Since Jun 25, 2026

The forensic side of this will be interesting. 😄

People leave evidence of their thinking everywhere. Reports, emails, chats, meeting notes. Sometimes the story around a decision is more revealing than the decision itself. 💀

d34th 42 posts Since Jun 25, 2026

Good.

Continue developing ideas, but keep discussions strategic. We are planning a campaign, not individual operations.

I want discipline, coordination, and patience. The groups that understand influence shape events.

The groups that do not simply react to them.